How do peer reviews enhance software quality?

Peer reviews enhance software quality primarily by providing additional scrutiny of code accuracy and quality. During a peer review, developers critically assess each other's code, which allows for identifying errors, bugs, and potential improvements that the original author might have overlooked. This collaborative approach not only helps in ensuring that the code functions as intended but also promotes adherence to best practices and coding standards.

Moreover, peer reviews facilitate knowledge sharing among team members, which can lead to a deeper understanding of the codebase and promote team learning. This broader perspective on the code can contribute to improved maintainability and overall software quality, making peer reviews an essential component of the software development process.

While the other options address important aspects of software development, they do not directly capture the primary benefit of peer reviews in enhancing quality through critical evaluation and shared expertise. For instance, focusing solely on design elements does not encompass the full scope of code review benefits, and minimizing coding time does not correlate with quality assurance. Ensuring uniform coding style is beneficial for consistency, but it does not directly relate to the rigorous examination of code quality that peer reviews provide.